Maximin Safety: When Failing to Lose is Preferable to Trying to Win

January 21, 2015 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning and Uncertainty

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Brad Gulko, Samantha Leung arXiv ID 1501.05031 Category cs.AI: Artificial Intelligence Cross-listed cs.GT Citations 1 Venue European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning and Uncertainty Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
We present a new decision rule, \emph{maximin safety}, that seeks to maintain a large margin from the worst outcome, in much the same way minimax regret seeks to minimize distance from the best. We argue that maximin safety is valuable both descriptively and normatively. Descriptively, maximin safety explains the well-known \emph{decoy effect}, in which the introduction of a dominated option changes preferences among the other options. Normatively, we provide an axiomatization that characterizes preferences induced by maximin safety, and show that maximin safety shares much of the same behavioral basis with minimax regret.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Artificial Intelligence

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted