Amenability of Schreier graphs and strongly generic algorithms for the conjugacy problem

January 22, 2015 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Journal of symbolic computation

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Volker Diekert, Alexei G. Myasnikov, Armin Weiß arXiv ID 1501.05579 Category math.GR Cross-listed cs.DM, cs.DS Citations 6 Venue Journal of symbolic computation Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
In various occasions the conjugacy problem in finitely generated amalgamated products and HNN extensions can be decided efficiently for elements which cannot be conjugated into the base groups. This observation asks for a bound on how many such elements there are. Such bounds can be derived using the theory of amenable graphs: In this work we examine Schreier graphs of amalgamated products and HNN extensions. For an amalgamated product $G = H *_A K $ with $[H:A] \geq [K:A] \geq 2$, the Schreier graph with respect to $H$ or $K$ turns out to be non-amenable if and only if $[H:A] \geq 3$. Moreover, for an HNN extension of the form $G = <H,b | bab^{-1}=Ο†(a), a \in A >$, we show that the Schreier graph of $G$ with respect to the subgroup $H$ is non-amenable if and only if $A \neq H \neq Ο†(A)$. As application of these characterizations we show that under certain conditions the conjugacy problem in fundamental groups of finite graphs of groups with free abelian vertex groups can be solved in polynomial time on a strongly generic set. Furthermore, the conjugacy problem in groups with more than one end can be solved with a strongly generic algorithm which has essentially the same time complexity as the word problem. These are rather striking results as the word problem might be easy, but the conjugacy problem might be even undecidable. Finally, our results yield another proof that the set where the conjugacy problem of the Baumslag group is decidable in polynomial time is also strongly generic.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” math.GR

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted