The Lock-free $k$-LSM Relaxed Priority Queue

March 19, 2015 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› ACM SIGPLAN Symposium on Principles & Practice of Parallel Programming

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Martin Wimmer, Jakob Gruber, Jesper Larsson TrΓ€ff, Philippas Tsigas arXiv ID 1503.05698 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 55 Venue ACM SIGPLAN Symposium on Principles & Practice of Parallel Programming Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
Priority queues are data structures which store keys in an ordered fashion to allow efficient access to the minimal (maximal) key. Priority queues are essential for many applications, e.g., Dijkstra's single-source shortest path algorithm, branch-and-bound algorithms, and prioritized schedulers. Efficient multiprocessor computing requires implementations of basic data structures that can be used concurrently and scale to large numbers of threads and cores. Lock-free data structures promise superior scalability by avoiding blocking synchronization primitives, but the \emph{delete-min} operation is an inherent scalability bottleneck in concurrent priority queues. Recent work has focused on alleviating this obstacle either by batching operations, or by relaxing the requirements to the \emph{delete-min} operation. We present a new, lock-free priority queue that relaxes the \emph{delete-min} operation so that it is allowed to delete \emph{any} of the $ρ+1$ smallest keys, where $ρ$ is a runtime configurable parameter. Additionally, the behavior is identical to a non-relaxed priority queue for items added and removed by the same thread. The priority queue is built from a logarithmic number of sorted arrays in a way similar to log-structured merge-trees. We experimentally compare our priority queue to recent state-of-the-art lock-free priority queues, both with relaxed and non-relaxed semantics, showing high performance and good scalability of our approach.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted