Linearly Supporting Feature Extraction For Automated Estimation Of Stellar Atmospheric Parameters
April 09, 2015 Β· Declared Dead Β· π arXiv.org
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Xiangru Li, Yu Lu, Georges Comte, Ali Luo, Yongheng Zhao, Yongjun Wang
arXiv ID
1504.02164
Category
astro-ph.SR
Cross-listed
astro-ph.IM,
cs.CV
Citations
12
Venue
arXiv.org
Last Checked
3 months ago
Abstract
We describe a scheme to extract linearly supporting (LSU) features from stellar spectra to automatically estimate the atmospheric parameters $T_{eff}$, log$~g$, and [Fe/H]. "Linearly supporting" means that the atmospheric parameters can be accurately estimated from the extracted features through a linear model. The successive steps of the process are as follow: first, decompose the spectrum using a wavelet packet (WP) and represent it by the derived decomposition coefficients; second, detect representative spectral features from the decomposition coefficients using the proposed method Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LARS)$_{bs}$; third, estimate the atmospheric parameters $T_{eff}$, log$~g$, and [Fe/H] from the detected features using a linear regression method. One prominent characteristic of this scheme is its ability to evaluate quantitatively the contribution of each detected feature to the atmospheric parameter estimate and also to trace back the physical significance of that feature. This work also shows that the usefulness of a component depends on both wavelength and frequency. The proposed scheme has been evaluated on both real spectra from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS)/SEGUE and synthetic spectra calculated from Kurucz's NEWODF models. On real spectra, we extracted 23 features to estimate $T_{eff}$, 62 features for log$~g$, and 68 features for [Fe/H]. Test consistencies between our estimates and those provided by the Spectroscopic Sarameter Pipeline of SDSS show that the mean absolute errors (MAEs) are 0.0062 dex for log$~T_{eff}$ (83 K for $T_{eff}$), 0.2345 dex for log$~g$, and 0.1564 dex for [Fe/H]. For the synthetic spectra, the MAE test accuracies are 0.0022 dex for log$~T_{eff}$ (32 K for $T_{eff}$), 0.0337 dex for log$~g$, and 0.0268 dex for [Fe/H].
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β astro-ph.SR
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
A Machine Learning Dataset Prepared From the NASA Solar Dynamics Observatory Mission
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
A hybrid supervised/unsupervised machine learning approach to solar flare prediction
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Enhancing SDO/HMI images using deep learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
DeepVel: deep learning for the estimation of horizontal velocities at the solar surface
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Solar Coronal Magnetic Field Extrapolation from Synchronic Data with AI-generated Farside
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted