Robustness of power systems under a democratic fiber bundle-like model
April 14, 2015 Β· Declared Dead Β· π Physical Review E 91, 062811, June 2015
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Osman YaΔan
arXiv ID
1504.03728
Category
physics.soc-ph
Cross-listed
cs.SI,
physics.data-an
Citations
5
Venue
Physical Review E 91, 062811, June 2015
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
We consider a power system with $N$ transmission lines whose initial loads (i.e., power flows) $L_1, \ldots, L_N$ are independent and identically distributed with $P_L(x)$. The capacity $C_i$ defines the maximum flow allowed on line $i$, and is assumed to be given by $C_i=(1+Ξ±)L_i$, with $Ξ±>0$. We study the robustness of this power system against random attacks (or, failures) that target a $p$-{\em fraction} of the lines, under a democratic fiber bundle-like model. Namely, when a line fails, the load it was carrying is redistributed equally among the remaining lines. Our contributions are as follows: i) we show analytically that the final breakdown of the system always takes place through a first-order transition at the critical attack size $p^{\star}=1-\frac{E[L]}{\max\{P(L>x)(Ξ±x + E[L ~|~ L>x])\}}~~~$; ii) we derive conditions on the distribution $P_L(x)$ for which the first order break down of the system occurs abruptly without any preceding diverging rate of failure; iii) we provide a detailed analysis of the robustness of the system under three specific load distributions: Uniform, Pareto, and Weibull, showing that with the minimum load $L_{\textrm{min}}$ and mean load $E[L]$ fixed, Pareto distribution is the worst (in terms of robustness) among the three, whereas Weibull distribution is the best with shape parameter selected relatively large; iv) we provide numerical results that confirm our mean-field analysis; and v) we show that $p^{\star}$ is maximized when the load distribution is a Dirac delta function centered at $E[L]$, i.e., when all lines carry the same load; we also show that optimal $p^{\star}$ equals $\fracΞ±{Ξ±+1}$. This last finding is particularly surprising given that heterogeneity is known to lead to high robustness against random failures in many other systems.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β physics.soc-ph
π
π
The Cartographer
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Networks beyond pairwise interactions: structure and dynamics
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Statistical physics of human cooperation
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Vital nodes identification in complex networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Influence maximization in complex networks through optimal percolation
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Scale-free networks are rare
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted