A new property of the Lovász number and duality relations between graph parameters

May 06, 2015 · The Ethereal · 🏛 Discrete Applied Mathematics

🔮 THE ETHEREAL: The Ethereal
Pure theory — exists on a plane beyond code

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Antonio Acín, Runyao Duan, David E. Roberson, Ana Belén Sainz, Andreas Winter arXiv ID 1505.01265 Category math.CO: Combinatorics Cross-listed cs.IT, quant-ph Citations 23 Venue Discrete Applied Mathematics Last Checked 2 months ago
Abstract
We show that for any graph $G$, by considering "activation" through the strong product with another graph $H$, the relation $α(G) \leq \vartheta(G)$ between the independence number and the Lovász number of $G$ can be made arbitrarily tight: Precisely, the inequality \[ α(G \times H) \leq \vartheta(G \times H) = \vartheta(G)\,\vartheta(H) \] becomes asymptotically an equality for a suitable sequence of ancillary graphs $H$. This motivates us to look for other products of graph parameters of $G$ and $H$ on the right hand side of the above relation. For instance, a result of Rosenfeld and Hales states that \[ α(G \times H) \leq α^*(G)\,α(H), \] with the fractional packing number $α^*(G)$, and for every $G$ there exists $H$ that makes the above an equality; conversely, for every graph $H$ there is a $G$ that attains equality. These findings constitute some sort of duality of graph parameters, mediated through the independence number, under which $α$ and $α^*$ are dual to each other, and the Lovász number $\vartheta$ is self-dual. We also show duality of Schrijver's and Szegedy's variants $\vartheta^-$ and $\vartheta^+$ of the Lovász number, and explore analogous notions for the chromatic number under strong and disjunctive graph products.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

📜 Similar Papers

In the same crypt — Combinatorics

🔮 🔮 The Ethereal

Tables of subspace codes

Daniel Heinlein, Michael Kiermaier, ... (+2 more)

math.CO 🏛 arXiv 📚 94 cites 10 years ago