Classification of Research Citations (CRC)

June 30, 2015 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› CLBib@ISSI

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Bilal Hayat Butt, Muhammad Rafi, Arsal Jamal, Raja Sami Ur Rehman, Syed Muhammad Zubair Alam, Muhammad Bilal Alam arXiv ID 1506.08966 Category cs.IR: Information Retrieval Cross-listed cs.DL Citations 18 Venue CLBib@ISSI Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Research is a continuous phenomenon. It is recursive in nature. Every research is based on some earlier research outcome. A general approach in reviewing the literature for a problem is to categorize earlier work for the same problem as positive and negative citations. In this paper, we propose a novel automated technique, which classifies whether an earlier work is cited as sentiment positive or sentiment negative. Our approach first extracted the portion of the cited text from citing paper. Using a sentiment lexicon we classify the citation as positive or negative by picking a window of at most five (5) sentences around the cited place (corpus). We have used NaΓ―ve-Bayes Classifier for sentiment analysis. The algorithm is evaluated on a manually annotated and class labelled collection of 150 research papers from the domain of computer science. Our preliminary results show an accuracy of 80%. We assert that our approach can be generalized to classification of scientific research papers in different disciplines.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Information Retrieval

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted