Bounds and Constructions for $\overline{3}$-Separable Codes with Length $3$

July 03, 2015 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Designs, Codes and Cryptography

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Minquan Cheng, Jing Jiang, Haiyan Li, Ying Miao, Xiaohu Tang arXiv ID 1507.00954 Category cs.IT: Information Theory Citations 0 Venue Designs, Codes and Cryptography Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Separable codes were introduced to provide protection against illegal redistribution of copyrighted multimedia material. Let $\mathcal{C}$ be a code of length $n$ over an alphabet of $q$ letters. The descendant code ${\sf desc}(\mathcal{C}_0)$ of $\mathcal{C}_0 = \{{\bf c}_1, {\bf c}_2, \ldots, {\bf c}_t\} \subseteq {\mathcal{C}}$ is defined to be the set of words ${\bf x} = (x_1, x_2, \ldots,x_n)^T$ such that $x_i \in \{c_{1,i}, c_{2,i}, \ldots, c_{t,i}\}$ for all $i=1, \ldots, n$, where ${\bf c}_j=(c_{j,1},c_{j,2},\ldots,c_{j,n})^T$. $\mathcal{C}$ is a $\overline{t}$-separable code if for any two distinct $\mathcal{C}_1, \mathcal{C}_2 \subseteq \mathcal{C}$ with $|\mathcal{C}_1| \le t$, $|\mathcal{C}_2| \le t$, we always have ${\sf desc}(\mathcal{C}_1) \neq {\sf desc}(\mathcal{C}_2)$. Let $M(\overline{t},n,q)$ denote the maximal possible size of such a separable code. In this paper, an upper bound on $M(\overline{3},3,q)$ is derived by considering an optimization problem related to a partial Latin square, and then two constructions for $\overline{3}$-SC$(3,M,q)$s are provided by means of perfect hash families and Steiner triple systems.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Information Theory

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted