Rewriting recursive aggregates in answer set programming: back to monotonicity

July 14, 2015 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Theory and Practice of Logic Programming 15 (2015) 559-573

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Mario Alviano, Wolfgang Faber, Martin Gebser arXiv ID 1507.03923 Category cs.AI: Artificial Intelligence Citations 0 Venue Theory and Practice of Logic Programming 15 (2015) 559-573 Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
Aggregation functions are widely used in answer set programming for representing and reasoning on knowledge involving sets of objects collectively. Current implementations simplify the structure of programs in order to optimize the overall performance. In particular, aggregates are rewritten into simpler forms known as monotone aggregates. Since the evaluation of normal programs with monotone aggregates is in general on a lower complexity level than the evaluation of normal programs with arbitrary aggregates, any faithful translation function must introduce disjunction in rule heads in some cases. However, no function of this kind is known. The paper closes this gap by introducing a polynomial, faithful, and modular translation for rewriting common aggregation functions into the simpler form accepted by current solvers. A prototype system allows for experimenting with arbitrary recursive aggregates, which are also supported in the recent version 4.5 of the grounder \textsc{gringo}, using the methods presented in this paper. To appear in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP), Proceedings of ICLP 2015.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Artificial Intelligence

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted