Adaptive Automation: Leveraging Machine Learning to Support Uninterrupted Automated Testing of Software Applications
August 04, 2015 Β· Declared Dead Β· π arXiv.org
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Rajesh Mathur, Scott Miles, Miao Du
arXiv ID
1508.00671
Category
cs.SE: Software Engineering
Citations
4
Venue
arXiv.org
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
Checking software application suitability using automated software tools has become a vital element for most organisations irrespective of whether they produce in-house software or simply customise off-the-shelf software applications for internal use. As software solutions become ever more complex, the industry becomes increasingly dependent on software automation tools, yet the brittle nature of the available software automation tools limits their effectiveness. Companies invest significantly in obtaining and implementing automation software but most of the tools fail to deliver when the cost of maintaining an effective automation test suite exceeds the cost and time that would have otherwise been spent on manual testing. A failing in the current generation of software automation tools is they do not adapt to unexpected modifications and obstructions without frequent (and time expensive) manual interference. Such issues are commonly acknowledged amongst industry practitioners, yet none of the current generation of tools have leveraged the advances in machine learning and artificial intelligence to address these problems. This paper proposes a framework solution that utilises machine learning concepts, namely fuzzy matching and error recovery. The suggested solution applies adaptive techniques to recover from unexpected obstructions that would otherwise have prevented the script from proceeding. Recovery details are presented to the user in a report which can be analysed to determine if the recovery procedure was acceptable and the framework will adapt future runs based on the decisions of the user. Using this framework, a practitioner can run the automated suits without human intervention while minimising the risk of schedule delays.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Software Engineering
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Microservices: yesterday, today, and tomorrow
π
π
The Cartographer
A Survey of Machine Learning for Big Code and Naturalness
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
An Overview on Smart Contracts: Challenges, Advances and Platforms
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Slither: A Static Analysis Framework For Smart Contracts
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
ContractFuzzer: Fuzzing Smart Contracts for Vulnerability Detection
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted