A note on convex characters, Fibonacci numbers and exponential-time algorithms

August 11, 2015 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Advances in Applied Mathematics

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Steven Kelk, Georgios Stamoulis arXiv ID 1508.02598 Category q-bio.PE Cross-listed cs.DS, math.CO Citations 11 Venue Advances in Applied Mathematics Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
Phylogenetic trees are used to model evolution: leaves are labelled to represent contemporary species ("taxa") and interior vertices represent extinct ancestors. Informally, convex characters are measurements on the contemporary species in which the subset of species (both contemporary and extinct) that share a given state, form a connected subtree. Given an unrooted, binary phylogenetic tree T on a set of n >= 2 taxa, a closed (but fairly opaque) expression for the number of convex characters on T has been known since 1992, and this is independent of the exact topology of T. In this note we prove that this number is actually equal to the (2n-1)th Fibonacci number. Next, we define g_k(T) to be the number of convex characters on T in which each state appears on at least k taxa. We show that, somewhat curiously, g_2(T) is also independent of the topology of T, and is equal to to the (n-1)th Fibonacci number. As we demonstrate, this topological neutrality subsequently breaks down for k >= 3. However, we show that for each fixed k >= 1, g_k(T) can be computed in O(n) time and the set of characters thus counted can be efficiently listed and sampled. We use these insights to give a simple but effective exact algorithm for the NP-hard maximum parsimony distance problem that runs in time $Θ( Ο†^{n} \cdot n^2 )$, where $Ο†\approx 1.618...$ is the golden ratio, and an exact algorithm which computes the tree bisection and reconnection distance (equivalently, a maximum agreement forest) in time $Θ( Ο†^{2n}\cdot \text{poly}(n))$, where $Ο†^2 \approx 2.619$.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” q-bio.PE

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted