The complexity of cyber attacks in a new layered-security model and the maximum-weight, rooted-subtree problem

August 12, 2015 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Geir Agnarsson, Raymond Greenlaw, Sanpawat Kantabutra arXiv ID 1508.03657 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Cross-listed cs.CR, math.CO Citations 3 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
In our cyber security model we define the concept of {\em penetration cost}, which is the cost that must be paid in order to break into the next layer of security. Given a tree $T$ rooted at a vertex $r$, a {\em penetrating cost} edge function $c$ on $T$, a {\em target-acquisition} vertex function $p$ on $T$, the attacker's {\em budget} and the {\em game-over threshold} $B,G \in {\mathbb{Q}}^{+}$ respectively, we consider the problem of determining the existence of a rooted subtree $T'$ of $T$ within the attacker's budget (that is, the sum of the costs of the edges in $T'$ is less than or equal to $B$) with total acquisition value more than the game-over threshold (that is, the sum of the target values of the nodes in $T'$ is greater than or equal to $G$). We prove that the general version of this problem is intractable, but does admit a polynomial time approximation scheme. We also analyze the complexity of three restricted versions of the problems, where the penetration cost is the constant function, integer-valued, and rational-valued among a given fixed number of distinct values.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted