A Faster Cutting Plane Method and its Implications for Combinatorial and Convex Optimization
August 20, 2015 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐ IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Yin Tat Lee, Aaron Sidford, Sam Chiu-wai Wong
arXiv ID
1508.04874
Category
cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms
Cross-listed
cs.DM,
math.NA,
math.OC
Citations
313
Venue
IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science
Last Checked
1 month ago
Abstract
We improve upon the running time for finding a point in a convex set given a separation oracle. In particular, given a separation oracle for a convex set $K\subset \mathbb{R}^n$ contained in a box of radius $R$, we show how to either find a point in $K$ or prove that $K$ does not contain a ball of radius $ฮต$ using an expected $O(n\log(nR/ฮต))$ oracle evaluations and additional time $O(n^3\log^{O(1)}(nR/ฮต))$. This matches the oracle complexity and improves upon the $O(n^{ฯ+1}\log(nR/ฮต))$ additional time of the previous fastest algorithm achieved over 25 years ago by Vaidya for the current matrix multiplication constant $ฯ<2.373$ when $R/ฮต=n^{O(1)}$. Using a mix of standard reductions and new techniques, our algorithm yields improved runtimes for solving classic problems in continuous and combinatorial optimization: Submodular Minimization: Our weakly and strongly polynomial time algorithms have runtimes of $O(n^2\log nM\cdot\text{EO}+n^3\log^{O(1)}nM)$ and $O(n^3\log^2 n\cdot\text{EO}+n^4\log^{O(1)}n)$, improving upon the previous best of $O((n^4\text{EO}+n^5)\log M)$ and $O(n^5\text{EO}+n^6)$. Matroid Intersection: Our runtimes are $O(nrT_{\text{rank}}\log n\log (nM) +n^3\log^{O(1)}(nM))$ and $O(n^2\log (nM) T_{\text{ind}}+n^3 \log^{O(1)} (nM))$, achieving the first quadratic bound on the query complexity for the independence and rank oracles. In the unweighted case, this is the first improvement since 1986 for independence oracle. Submodular Flow: Our runtime is $O(n^2\log nCU\cdot\text{EO}+n^3\log^{O(1)}nCU)$, improving upon the previous bests from 15 years ago roughly by a factor of $O(n^4)$. Semidefinite Programming: Our runtime is $\tilde{O}(n(n^2+m^ฯ+S))$, improving upon the previous best of $\tilde{O}(n(n^ฯ+m^ฯ+S))$ for the regime where the number of nonzeros $S$ is small.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
๐ Similar Papers
In the same crypt โ Data Structures & Algorithms
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Relief-Based Feature Selection: Introduction and Review
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Route Planning in Transportation Networks
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Near-linear time approximation algorithms for optimal transport via Sinkhorn iteration
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Hierarchical Clustering: Objective Functions and Algorithms
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Graph Isomorphism in Quasipolynomial Time
Died the same way โ ๐ป Ghosted
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted