Query Workload-based RDF Graph Fragmentation and Allocation

August 31, 2015 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› International Conference on Extending Database Technology

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Peng Peng, Lei Zou, Lei Chen, Dongyan Zhao arXiv ID 1508.07845 Category cs.DC: Distributed Computing Cross-listed cs.DB Citations 22 Venue International Conference on Extending Database Technology Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
As the volume of the RDF data becomes increasingly large, it is essential for us to design a distributed database system to manage it. For distributed RDF data design, it is quite common to partition the RDF data into some parts, called fragments, which are then distributed. Thus, the distribution design consists of two steps: fragmentation and allocation. In this paper, we propose a method to explore the intrinsic similarities among the structures of queries in a workload for fragmentation and allocation, which aims to reduce the number of crossing matches and the communication cost during SPARQL query processing. Specifically, we mine and select some frequent access patterns to reflect the characteristics of the workload. Here, although we prove that selecting the optimal set of frequent access patterns is NP-hard, we propose a heuristic algorithm which guarantees both the data integrity and the approximation ratio. Based on the selected frequent access patterns, we propose two fragmentation strategies, vertical and horizontal fragmentation strategies, to divide RDF graphs while meeting different kinds of query processing objectives. Vertical fragmentation is for better throughput and horizontal fragmentation is for better performance. After fragmentation, we discuss how to allocate these fragments to various sites. Finally, we discuss how to process a query based on the results of fragmentation and allocation. Extensive experiments confirm the superior performance of our proposed solutions.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Distributed Computing

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted