Algorithms for Provisioning Queries and Analytics
December 18, 2015 Β· Declared Dead Β· π International Conference on Database Theory
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Sepehr Assadi, Sanjeev Khanna, Yang Li, Val Tannen
arXiv ID
1512.06143
Category
cs.DB: Databases
Cross-listed
cs.DS
Citations
12
Venue
International Conference on Database Theory
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
Provisioning is a technique for avoiding repeated expensive computations in what-if analysis. Given a query, an analyst formulates $k$ hypotheticals, each retaining some of the tuples of a database instance, possibly overlapping, and she wishes to answer the query under scenarios, where a scenario is defined by a subset of the hypotheticals that are "turned on". We say that a query admits compact provisioning if given any database instance and any $k$ hypotheticals, one can create a poly-size (in $k$) sketch that can then be used to answer the query under any of the $2^{k}$ possible scenarios without accessing the original instance. In this paper, we focus on provisioning complex queries that combine relational algebra (the logical component), grouping, and statistics/analytics (the numerical component). We first show that queries that compute quantiles or linear regression (as well as simpler queries that compute count and sum/average of positive values) can be compactly provisioned to provide (multiplicative) approximate answers to an arbitrary precision. In contrast, exact provisioning for each of these statistics requires the sketch size to be exponential in $k$. We then establish that for any complex query whose logical component is a positive relational algebra query, as long as the numerical component can be compactly provisioned, the complex query itself can be compactly provisioned. On the other hand, introducing negation or recursion in the logical component again requires the sketch size to be exponential in $k$. While our positive results use algorithms that do not access the original instance after a scenario is known, we prove our lower bounds even for the case when, knowing the scenario, limited access to the instance is allowed.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Databases
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Untangling Blockchain: A Data Processing View of Blockchain Systems
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Converting Static Image Datasets to Spiking Neuromorphic Datasets Using Saccades
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
BLOCKBENCH: A Framework for Analyzing Private Blockchains
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Data Synthesis based on Generative Adversarial Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
HoloClean: Holistic Data Repairs with Probabilistic Inference
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted