Randomized approximate nearest neighbor search with limited adaptivity

February 14, 2016 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› ACM Symposium on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Mingmou Liu, Xiaoyin Pan, Yitong Yin arXiv ID 1602.04421 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 8 Venue ACM Symposium on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
We study the fundamental problem of approximate nearest neighbor search in $d$-dimensional Hamming space $\{0,1\}^d$. We study the complexity of the problem in the famous cell-probe model, a classic model for data structures. We consider algorithms in the cell-probe model with limited adaptivity, where the algorithm makes $k$ rounds of parallel accesses to the data structure for a given $k$. For any $k\ge 1$, we give a simple randomized algorithm solving the approximate nearest neighbor search using $k$ rounds of parallel memory accesses, with $O(k(\log d)^{1/k})$ accesses in total. We also give a more sophisticated randomized algorithm using $O(k+(\frac{1}{k}\log d)^{O(1/k)})$ memory accesses in $k$ rounds for large enough $k$. Both algorithms use data structures of size polynomial in $n$, the number of points in the database. For the lower bound, we prove an $Ω(\frac{1}{k}(\log d)^{1/k})$ lower bound for the total number of memory accesses required by any randomized algorithm solving the approximate nearest neighbor search within $k\le\frac{\log\log d}{2\log\log\log d}$ rounds of parallel memory accesses on any data structures of polynomial size. This lower bound shows that our first algorithm is asymptotically optimal for any constant round $k$. And our second algorithm approaches the asymptotically optimal tradeoff between rounds and memory accesses, in a sense that the lower bound of memory accesses for any $k_1$ rounds can be matched by the algorithm within $k_2=O(k_1)$ rounds. In the extreme, for some large enough $k=Θ\left(\frac{\log\log d}{\log\log\log d}\right)$, our second algorithm matches the $Θ\left(\frac{\log\log d}{\log\log\log d}\right)$ tight bound for fully adaptive algorithms for approximate nearest neighbor search due to Chakrabarti and Regev.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted