Sorting with Asymmetric Read and Write Costs

March 11, 2016 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› ACM Symposium on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Guy E. Blelloch, Jeremy T. Fineman, Phillip B. Gibbons, Yan Gu, Julian Shun arXiv ID 1603.03505 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 59 Venue ACM Symposium on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
Emerging memory technologies have a significant gap between the cost, both in time and in energy, of writing to memory versus reading from memory. In this paper we present models and algorithms that account for this difference, with a focus on write-efficient sorting algorithms. First, we consider the PRAM model with asymmetric write cost, and show that sorting can be performed in $O\left(n\right)$ writes, $O\left(n \log n\right)$ reads, and logarithmic depth (parallel time). Next, we consider a variant of the External Memory (EM) model that charges $Ο‰> 1$ for writing a block of size $B$ to the secondary memory, and present variants of three EM sorting algorithms (multi-way mergesort, sample sort, and heapsort using buffer trees) that asymptotically reduce the number of writes over the original algorithms, and perform roughly $Ο‰$ block reads for every block write. Finally, we define a variant of the Ideal-Cache model with asymmetric write costs, and present write-efficient, cache-oblivious parallel algorithms for sorting, FFTs, and matrix multiplication. Adapting prior bounds for work-stealing and parallel-depth-first schedulers to the asymmetric setting, these yield parallel cache complexity bounds for machines with private caches or with a shared cache, respectively.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted