Computing Join Queries with Functional Dependencies

April 01, 2016 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐Ÿ› ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database Systems

๐Ÿ‘ป CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Mahmoud Abo Khamis, Hung Q. Ngo, Dan Suciu arXiv ID 1604.00111 Category cs.DB: Databases Cross-listed cs.DS, cs.IT Citations 50 Venue ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database Systems Last Checked 2 months ago
Abstract
Recently, Gottlob, Lee, Valiant, and Valiant (GLVV) presented an output size bound for join queries with functional dependencies (FD), based on a linear program on polymatroids. GLVV bound strictly generalizes the bound of Atserias, Grohe and Marx (AGM) for queries with no FD, in which case there are known algorithms running within AGM bound and thus are worst-case optimal. A main result of this paper is an algorithm for computing join queries with FDs, running within GLVV bound up to a poly-log factor. In particular, our algorithm is worst-case optimal for any query where the GLVV bound is tight. As an unexpected by-product, our algorithm manages to solve a harder problem, where (some) input relations may have prescribed maximum degree bounds, of which both functional dependencies and cardinality bounds are special cases. We extend Gottlob et al. framework by replacing all variable subsets with the lattice of closed sets (under the given FDs). This gives us new insights into the structure of the worst-case bound and worst-case instances. While it is still open whether GLVV bound is tight in general, we show that it is tight on distributive lattices and some other simple lattices. Distributive lattices capture a strict superset of queries with no FD and with simple FDs. We also present two simpler algorithms which are also worst-case optimal on distributive lattices within a single-$\log$ factor, but they do not match GLVV bound on a general lattice. Our algorithms are designed based on a novel principle: we turn a proof of a polymatroid-based output size bound into an algorithm.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Databases

R.I.P. ๐Ÿ‘ป Ghosted

Datasheets for Datasets

Timnit Gebru, Jamie Morgenstern, ... (+5 more)

cs.DB ๐Ÿ› CACM ๐Ÿ“š 2.6K cites 8 years ago

Died the same way โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ป Ghosted