Efficient and Compact Representations of Some Non-Canonical Prefix-Free Codes

May 21, 2016 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› SPIRE

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Antonio FariΓ±a, Travis Gagie, Szymon Grabowski, Giovanni Manzini, Gonzalo Navarro, Alberto OrdΓ³Γ±ez arXiv ID 1605.06615 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 5 Venue SPIRE Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
For many kinds of prefix-free codes there are efficient and compact alternatives to the traditional tree-based representation. Since these put the codes into canonical form, however, they can only be used when we can choose the order in which codewords are assigned to symbols. In this paper we first show how, given a probability distribution over an alphabet of $Οƒ$ symbols, we can store an optimal alphabetic prefix-free code in $\Oh{Οƒ\log L}$ bits such that we can encode and decode any codeword of length $\ell$ in $\Oh{\min (\ell, \log L)}$ time, where $L$ is the maximum codeword length. With $\Oh{2^{L^Ξ΅}}$ further bits, for any constant $Ξ΅>0$, we can encode and decode $\Oh{\log \ell}$ time. We then show how to store a nearly optimal alphabetic prefix-free code in \(o (Οƒ)\) bits such that we can encode and decode in constant time. We also consider a kind of optimal prefix-free code introduced recently where the codewords' lengths are non-decreasing if arranged in lexicographic order of their reverses. We reduce their storage space to $\Oh{Οƒ\log L}$ while maintaining encoding and decoding times in $\Oh{\ell}$. We also show how, with $\Oh{2^{Ξ΅L}}$ further bits, we can encode and decode in constant time. All of our results hold in the word-RAM model.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted