Human Attention in Visual Question Answering: Do Humans and Deep Networks Look at the Same Regions?
June 11, 2016 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐ Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Abhishek Das, Harsh Agrawal, C. Lawrence Zitnick, Devi Parikh, Dhruv Batra
arXiv ID
1606.03556
Category
cs.CV: Computer Vision
Cross-listed
cs.CL
Citations
482
Venue
Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
Last Checked
2 months ago
Abstract
We conduct large-scale studies on `human attention' in Visual Question Answering (VQA) to understand where humans choose to look to answer questions about images. We design and test multiple game-inspired novel attention-annotation interfaces that require the subject to sharpen regions of a blurred image to answer a question. Thus, we introduce the VQA-HAT (Human ATtention) dataset. We evaluate attention maps generated by state-of-the-art VQA models against human attention both qualitatively (via visualizations) and quantitatively (via rank-order correlation). Overall, our experiments show that current attention models in VQA do not seem to be looking at the same regions as humans.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
๐ Similar Papers
In the same crypt โ Computer Vision
๐
๐
Old Age
๐
๐
Old Age
Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detection
๐
๐
Old Age
SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detector
๐
๐
Old Age
Squeeze-and-Excitation Networks
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Vision
Died the same way โ ๐ป Ghosted
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted