Information-theoretic thresholds for community detection in sparse networks
July 06, 2016 Β· Declared Dead Β· π COLT 2016
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Jess Banks, Cristopher Moore, Joe Neeman, Praneeth Netrapalli
arXiv ID
1607.01760
Category
math.PR
Cross-listed
cond-mat.stat-mech,
cs.CC,
cs.IT,
cs.SI
Citations
0
Venue
COLT 2016
Last Checked
5 months ago
Abstract
We give upper and lower bounds on the information-theoretic threshold for community detection in the stochastic block model. Specifically, consider the symmetric stochastic block model with $q$ groups, average degree $d$, and connection probabilities $c_\text{in}/n$ and $c_\text{out}/n$ for within-group and between-group edges respectively; let $Ξ»= (c_\text{in}-c_\text{out})/(qd)$. We show that, when $q$ is large, and $Ξ»= O(1/q)$, the critical value of $d$ at which community detection becomes possible---in physical terms, the condensation threshold---is \[ d_\text{c} = Ξ\!\left( \frac{\log q}{q Ξ»^2} \right) \, , \] with tighter results in certain regimes. Above this threshold, we show that any partition of the nodes into $q$ groups which is as `good' as the planted one, in terms of the number of within- and between-group edges, is correlated with it. This gives an exponential-time algorithm that performs better than chance; specifically, community detection becomes possible below the Kesten-Stigum bound for $q \ge 5$ in the disassortative case $Ξ»< 0$, and for $q \ge 11$ in the assortative case $Ξ»>0$ (similar upper bounds were obtained independently by Abbe and Sandon). Conversely, below this threshold, we show that no algorithm can label the vertices better than chance, or even distinguish the block model from an \ER\ random graph with high probability. Our lower bound on $d_\text{c}$ uses Robinson and Wormald's small subgraph conditioning method, and we also give (less explicit) results for non-symmetric stochastic block models. In the symmetric case, we obtain explicit results by using bounds on certain functions of doubly stochastic matrices due to Achlioptas and Naor; indeed, our lower bound on $d_\text{c}$ is their second moment lower bound on the $q$-colorability threshold for random graphs with a certain effective degree.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β math.PR
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
π
π
The Cartographer
An Introduction to Matrix Concentration Inequalities
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Non-backtracking spectrum of random graphs: community detection and non-regular Ramanujan graphs
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Convergence of the Deep BSDE Method for Coupled FBSDEs
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
A Random Matrix Approach to Neural Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Concentration and regularization of random graphs
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted