Learning opening books in partially observable games: using random seeds in Phantom Go

July 08, 2016 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence and Games

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Tristan Cazenave, Jialin Liu, Fabien Teytaud, Olivier Teytaud arXiv ID 1607.02431 Category cs.AI: Artificial Intelligence Cross-listed cs.GT Citations 8 Venue IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence and Games Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Many artificial intelligences (AIs) are randomized. One can be lucky or unlucky with the random seed; we quantify this effect and show that, maybe contrarily to intuition, this is far from being negligible. Then, we apply two different existing algorithms for selecting good seeds and good probability distributions over seeds. This mainly leads to learning an opening book. We apply this to Phantom Go, which, as all phantom games, is hard for opening book learning. We improve the winning rate from 50% to 70% in 5x5 against the same AI, and from approximately 0% to 40% in 5x5, 7x7 and 9x9 against a stronger (learning) opponent.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Artificial Intelligence

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted