The quasiequational theory of relational lattices, in the pure lattice signature (embeddability into relational lattices is undecidable)

July 11, 2016 ยท The Ethereal ยท + Add venue

๐Ÿ”ฎ THE ETHEREAL: The Ethereal
Pure theory โ€” exists on a plane beyond code

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Luigi Santocanale arXiv ID 1607.02988 Category cs.LO: Logic in CS Cross-listed cs.DB, math.CT, math.LO Citations 1 Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
The natural join and the inner union operations combine relations of a database. Tropashko and Spight realized that these two operations are themeet and join operations in a class of lattices, known by now as the relational lattices. They proposed then lattice theory as an algebraic approach to thetheory of databases alternative to the relational algebra. Litak et al. proposed an axiomatization of relational lattices over the signature that extends thepure lattice signature with a constant and argued that the quasiequational theory of relational lattices over this extended signature is undecidable.We prove in this paper that embeddability is undecidable for relational lattices. More precisely, it is undecidable whether a finite subdirectly-irreduciblelattice can be embedded into a relational lattice. Our proof is a reduction from the coverability problem of a multimodal frame by a universal product frameand, indirectly, from the representability problem for relation algebras. As corollaries we obtain the following results: the quasiequational theoryof relational lattices over the pure lattice signature is undecidable and has no finite base; there is a quasiequation over the pure lattice signature which holds in all the finite relational lattices but fails in an infinite relational lattice.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Logic in CS