Update Strength in EDAs and ACO: How to Avoid Genetic Drift

July 14, 2016 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐Ÿ› Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation

๐Ÿ‘ป CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Dirk Sudholt, Carsten Witt arXiv ID 1607.04063 Category cs.NE: Neural & Evolutionary Citations 38 Venue Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Last Checked 1 month ago
Abstract
We provide a rigorous runtime analysis concerning the update strength, a vital parameter in probabilistic model-building GAs such as the step size $1/K$ in the compact Genetic Algorithm (cGA) and the evaporation factor $ฯ$ in ACO. While a large update strength is desirable for exploitation, there is a general trade-off: too strong updates can lead to genetic drift and poor performance. We demonstrate this trade-off for the cGA and a simple MMAS ACO algorithm on the OneMax function. More precisely, we obtain lower bounds on the expected runtime of $ฮฉ(K\sqrt{n} + n \log n)$ and $ฮฉ(\sqrt{n}/ฯ+ n \log n)$, respectively, showing that the update strength should be limited to $1/K, ฯ= O(1/(\sqrt{n} \log n))$. In fact, choosing $1/K, ฯ\sim 1/(\sqrt{n}\log n)$ both algorithms efficiently optimize OneMax in expected time $O(n \log n)$. Our analyses provide new insights into the stochastic behavior of probabilistic model-building GAs and propose new guidelines for setting the update strength in global optimization.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Neural & Evolutionary

R.I.P. ๐Ÿ‘ป Ghosted

LSTM: A Search Space Odyssey

Klaus Greff, Rupesh Kumar Srivastava, ... (+3 more)

cs.NE ๐Ÿ› IEEE TNNLS ๐Ÿ“š 6.0K cites 11 years ago

Died the same way โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ป Ghosted