Minimizing Uncertainty through Sensor Placement with Angle Constraints
July 20, 2016 Β· Declared Dead Β· π Canadian Conference on Computational Geometry
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Ioana O. Bercea, Volkan Isler, Samir Khuller
arXiv ID
1607.05791
Category
cs.CG: Computational Geometry
Cross-listed
cs.DS,
cs.RO
Citations
2
Venue
Canadian Conference on Computational Geometry
Last Checked
3 months ago
Abstract
We study the problem of sensor placement in environments in which localization is a necessity, such as ad-hoc wireless sensor networks that allow the placement of a few anchors that know their location or sensor arrays that are tracking a target. In most of these situations, the quality of localization depends on the relative angle between the target and the pair of sensors observing it. In this paper, we consider placing a small number of sensors which ensure good angular $Ξ±$-coverage: given $Ξ±$ in $[0,Ο/2]$, for each target location $t$, there must be at least two sensors $s_1$ and $s_2$ such that the $\angle(s_1 t s_2)$ is in the interval $[Ξ±, Ο-Ξ±]$. One of the main difficulties encountered in such problems is that since the constraints depend on at least two sensors, building a solution must account for the inherent dependency between selected sensors, a feature that generic Set Cover techniques do not account for. We introduce a general framework that guarantees an angular coverage that is arbitrarily close to $Ξ±$ for any $Ξ±<= Ο/3$ and apply it to a variety of problems to get bi-criteria approximations. When the angular coverage is required to be at least a constant fraction of $Ξ±$, we obtain results that are strictly better than what standard geometric Set Cover methods give. When the angular coverage is required to be at least $(1-1/Ξ΄)\cdotΞ±$, we obtain a $\mathcal{O}(\log Ξ΄)$- approximation for sensor placement with $Ξ±$-coverage on the plane. In the presence of additional distance or visibility constraints, the framework gives a $\mathcal{O}(\logΞ΄\cdot\log k_{OPT})$-approximation, where $k_{OPT}$ is the size of the optimal solution. We also use our framework to give a $\mathcal{O}(\log Ξ΄)$-approximation that ensures $(1-1/Ξ΄)\cdot Ξ±$-coverage and covers every target within distance $3R$.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Computational Geometry
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Dynamic Planar Convex Hull
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
TEMPO: Feature-Endowed TeichmΓΌller Extremal Mappings of Point Clouds
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Manufacturing Cost Estimation and Machining Feature Visualization
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Coresets for Clustering in Euclidean Spaces: Importance Sampling is Nearly Optimal
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Momen(e)t: Flavor the Moments in Learning to Classify Shapes
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted