Minimizing Uncertainty through Sensor Placement with Angle Constraints

July 20, 2016 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Canadian Conference on Computational Geometry

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Ioana O. Bercea, Volkan Isler, Samir Khuller arXiv ID 1607.05791 Category cs.CG: Computational Geometry Cross-listed cs.DS, cs.RO Citations 2 Venue Canadian Conference on Computational Geometry Last Checked 3 months ago
Abstract
We study the problem of sensor placement in environments in which localization is a necessity, such as ad-hoc wireless sensor networks that allow the placement of a few anchors that know their location or sensor arrays that are tracking a target. In most of these situations, the quality of localization depends on the relative angle between the target and the pair of sensors observing it. In this paper, we consider placing a small number of sensors which ensure good angular $Ξ±$-coverage: given $Ξ±$ in $[0,Ο€/2]$, for each target location $t$, there must be at least two sensors $s_1$ and $s_2$ such that the $\angle(s_1 t s_2)$ is in the interval $[Ξ±, Ο€-Ξ±]$. One of the main difficulties encountered in such problems is that since the constraints depend on at least two sensors, building a solution must account for the inherent dependency between selected sensors, a feature that generic Set Cover techniques do not account for. We introduce a general framework that guarantees an angular coverage that is arbitrarily close to $Ξ±$ for any $Ξ±<= Ο€/3$ and apply it to a variety of problems to get bi-criteria approximations. When the angular coverage is required to be at least a constant fraction of $Ξ±$, we obtain results that are strictly better than what standard geometric Set Cover methods give. When the angular coverage is required to be at least $(1-1/Ξ΄)\cdotΞ±$, we obtain a $\mathcal{O}(\log Ξ΄)$- approximation for sensor placement with $Ξ±$-coverage on the plane. In the presence of additional distance or visibility constraints, the framework gives a $\mathcal{O}(\logΞ΄\cdot\log k_{OPT})$-approximation, where $k_{OPT}$ is the size of the optimal solution. We also use our framework to give a $\mathcal{O}(\log Ξ΄)$-approximation that ensures $(1-1/Ξ΄)\cdot Ξ±$-coverage and covers every target within distance $3R$.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Computational Geometry

R.I.P. πŸ‘» Ghosted

Dynamic Planar Convex Hull

Riko Jacob, Gerth StΓΈlting Brodal

cs.CG πŸ› The 43rd Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 2002. Proceedings. πŸ“š 240 cites 7 years ago

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted