Hereditary Graph Classes: When the Complexities of Colouring and Clique Cover Coincide

July 22, 2016 Β· Declared Dead Β· + Add venue

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Alexandre BlanchΓ©, Konrad K. Dabrowski, Matthew Johnson, DaniΓ«l Paulusma arXiv ID 1607.06757 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Cross-listed cs.CC, cs.DM, math.CO Citations 1 Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
A graph is $(H_1,H_2)$-free for a pair of graphs $H_1,H_2$ if it contains no induced subgraph isomorphic to $H_1$ or $H_2$. In 2001, KrΓ‘l', KratochvΓ­l, Tuza, and Woeginger initiated a study into the complexity of Colouring for $(H_1,H_2)$-free graphs. Since then, others have tried to complete their study, but many cases remain open. We focus on those $(H_1,H_2)$-free graphs where $H_2$ is $\overline{H_1}$, the complement of $H_1$. As these classes are closed under complementation, the computational complexities of Colouring and Clique Cover coincide. By combining new and known results, we are able to classify the complexity of Colouring and Clique Cover for $(H,\overline{H})$-free graphs for all cases except when $H=sP_1+ P_3$ for $s\geq 3$ or $H=sP_1+P_4$ for $s\geq 2$. We also classify the complexity of Colouring on graph classes characterized by forbidding a finite number of self-complementary induced subgraphs, and we initiate a study of $k$-Colouring for $(P_r,\overline{P_r})$-free graphs.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted