Consensus of Dependent Opinions

September 06, 2016 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Sujoy Chatterjee, Anirban Mukhopadhyay, Malay Bhattacharyya arXiv ID 1609.01408 Category cs.HC: Human-Computer Interaction Citations 5 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Providing opinions through labeling of images, tweets, etc. have drawn immense interest in crowdsourcing markets. This invokes a major challenge of aggregating multiple opinions received from different crowd workers for deriving the final judgment. Generally, opinion aggregation models deal with independent opinions, which are given unanimously and are not visible to all. However, in many real-life cases, it is required to make the opinions public as soon as they are received. This makes the opinions dependent and might incorporate some bias. In this paper, we address a novel problem, hereafter denoted as dependent judgment analysis, and discuss the requirements for developing an appropriate model to deal with this problem. The challenge remains to be improving the consensus by revealing true opinions.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Human-Computer Interaction

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted