Random Shuffling and Resets for the Non-stationary Stochastic Bandit Problem

September 07, 2016 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Robin Allesiardo, RaphaΓ«l FΓ©raud, Odalric-Ambrym Maillard arXiv ID 1609.02139 Category cs.AI: Artificial Intelligence Citations 1 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
We consider a non-stationary formulation of the stochastic multi-armed bandit where the rewards are no longer assumed to be identically distributed. For the best-arm identification task, we introduce a version of Successive Elimination based on random shuffling of the $K$ arms. We prove that under a novel and mild assumption on the mean gap $Ξ”$, this simple but powerful modification achieves the same guarantees in term of sample complexity and cumulative regret than its original version, but in a much wider class of problems, as it is not anymore constrained to stationary distributions. We also show that the original {\sc Successive Elimination} fails to have controlled regret in this more general scenario, thus showing the benefit of shuffling. We then remove our mild assumption and adapt the algorithm to the best-arm identification task with switching arms. We adapt the definition of the sample complexity for that case and prove that, against an optimal policy with $N-1$ switches of the optimal arm, this new algorithm achieves an expected sample complexity of $O(Ξ”^{-2}\sqrt{NKΞ΄^{-1} \log(K Ξ΄^{-1})})$, where $Ξ΄$ is the probability of failure of the algorithm, and an expected cumulative regret of $O(Ξ”^{-1}{\sqrt{NTK \log (TK)}})$ after $T$ time steps.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Artificial Intelligence

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted