Integrating citizen science with online learning to ask better questions

September 02, 2016 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Vineet Pandey, Scott Klemmer, Amnon Amir, Justine Debelius, Embriette R. Hyde, Tomasz Kosciolek, Rob Knight arXiv ID 1609.05763 Category cs.HC: Human-Computer Interaction Cross-listed cs.CY Citations 0 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
Online learners spend millions of hours per year testing their new skills on assignments with known answers. This paper explores whether framing research questions as assignments with unknown answers helps learners generate novel, useful, and difficult-to-find knowledge while increasing their motivation by contributing to a larger goal. Collaborating with the American Gut Project, the world's largest crowdfunded citizen science project, we deploy Gut Instinct to allow novices to generate hypotheses about the constitution of the human gut microbiome. The tool enables online learners to explore learning material about the microbiome and create their own theories around causal variances for microbiome. Building on crowdsourcing or serious games that use people as replaceable units, this work-in-progress lays our plans for how people (a) use their personal knowledge (b) towards solving a larger real-world goal (c) that can provide potential benefits to them. We hope to demonstrate that Gut Instinct citizen scientists generate useful hypotheses, perform better on learning tasks than traditional MOOC learners, and are better engaged with the learning material.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Human-Computer Interaction

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted