Binomial Checkpointing for Arbitrary Programs with No User Annotation

November 10, 2016 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Jeffrey Mark Siskind, Barak A. Pearlmutter arXiv ID 1611.03410 Category cs.PL: Programming Languages Cross-listed cs.LG, cs.MS Citations 2 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Heretofore, automatic checkpointing at procedure-call boundaries, to reduce the space complexity of reverse mode, has been provided by systems like Tapenade. However, binomial checkpointing, or treeverse, has only been provided in Automatic Differentiation (AD) systems in special cases, e.g., through user-provided pragmas on DO loops in Tapenade, or as the nested taping mechanism in adol-c for time integration processes, which requires that user code be refactored. We present a framework for applying binomial checkpointing to arbitrary code with no special annotation or refactoring required. This is accomplished by applying binomial checkpointing directly to a program trace. This trace is produced by a general-purpose checkpointing mechanism that is orthogonal to AD.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Programming Languages

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted