Rate of convergence of major cost incurred in the in-situ permutation algorithm

November 15, 2016 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Sumit Kumar Jha arXiv ID 1611.04784 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 0 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
The in-situ permutation algorithm due to MacLeod replaces $(x_{1},\cdots,x_{n})$ by $(x_{p(1)},\cdots,x_{p(n)})$ where $Ο€=(p(1),\cdots,p(n))$ is a permutation of $\{1,2,\cdots,n\}$ using at most $O(1)$ space. Kirshenhofer, Prodinger and Tichy have shown that the major cost incurred in the algorithm satisfies a recurrence similar to sequence of the number of key comparisons needed by the Quicksort algorithm to sort an array of $n$ randomly permuted items. Further, Hwang has proved that the normalized cost converges in distribution. Here, following Neininger and RΓΌschendorf, we prove the that rate of convergence to be of the order $Θ(\ln(n)/n)$ in the Zolotarev metric.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted