Randomized Mechanisms for Selling Reserved Instances in Cloud
November 22, 2016 Β· Declared Dead Β· π AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Jia Zhang, Weidong Ma, Tao Qin, Xiaoming Sun, Tie-Yan Liu
arXiv ID
1611.07379
Category
cs.GT: Game Theory
Cross-listed
cs.AI
Citations
7
Venue
AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Last Checked
5 months ago
Abstract
Selling reserved instances (or virtual machines) is a basic service in cloud computing. In this paper, we consider a more flexible pricing model for instance reservation, in which a customer can propose the time length and number of resources of her request, while in today's industry, customers can only choose from several predefined reservation packages. Under this model, we design randomized mechanisms for customers coming online to optimize social welfare and providers' revenue. We first consider a simple case, where the requests from the customers do not vary too much in terms of both length and value density. We design a randomized mechanism that achieves a competitive ratio $\frac{1}{42}$ for both \emph{social welfare} and \emph{revenue}, which is a improvement as there is usually no revenue guarantee in previous works such as \cite{azar2015ec,wang2015selling}. This ratio can be improved up to $\frac{1}{11}$ when we impose a realistic constraint on the maximum number of resources used by each request. On the hardness side, we show an upper bound $\frac{1}{3}$ on competitive ratio for any randomized mechanism. We then extend our mechanism to the general case and achieve a competitive ratio $\frac{1}{42\log k\log T}$ for both social welfare and revenue, where $T$ is the ratio of the maximum request length to the minimum request length and $k$ is the ratio of the maximum request value density to the minimum request value density. This result outperforms the previous upper bound $\frac{1}{CkT}$ for deterministic mechanisms \cite{wang2015selling}. We also prove an upper bound $\frac{2}{\log 8kT}$ for any randomized mechanism. All the mechanisms we provide are in a greedy style. They are truthful and easy to be integrated into practical cloud systems.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Game Theory
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
A Motivational Game-Theoretic Approach for Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading in the Smart Grid
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Computing Resource Allocation in Three-Tier IoT Fog Networks: a Joint Optimization Approach Combining Stackelberg Game and Matching
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Fast Convergence of Regularized Learning in Games
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Computation Peer Offloading for Energy-Constrained Mobile Edge Computing in Small-Cell Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Blockchain Mining Games
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted