Randomized Mechanisms for Selling Reserved Instances in Cloud

November 22, 2016 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Jia Zhang, Weidong Ma, Tao Qin, Xiaoming Sun, Tie-Yan Liu arXiv ID 1611.07379 Category cs.GT: Game Theory Cross-listed cs.AI Citations 7 Venue AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
Selling reserved instances (or virtual machines) is a basic service in cloud computing. In this paper, we consider a more flexible pricing model for instance reservation, in which a customer can propose the time length and number of resources of her request, while in today's industry, customers can only choose from several predefined reservation packages. Under this model, we design randomized mechanisms for customers coming online to optimize social welfare and providers' revenue. We first consider a simple case, where the requests from the customers do not vary too much in terms of both length and value density. We design a randomized mechanism that achieves a competitive ratio $\frac{1}{42}$ for both \emph{social welfare} and \emph{revenue}, which is a improvement as there is usually no revenue guarantee in previous works such as \cite{azar2015ec,wang2015selling}. This ratio can be improved up to $\frac{1}{11}$ when we impose a realistic constraint on the maximum number of resources used by each request. On the hardness side, we show an upper bound $\frac{1}{3}$ on competitive ratio for any randomized mechanism. We then extend our mechanism to the general case and achieve a competitive ratio $\frac{1}{42\log k\log T}$ for both social welfare and revenue, where $T$ is the ratio of the maximum request length to the minimum request length and $k$ is the ratio of the maximum request value density to the minimum request value density. This result outperforms the previous upper bound $\frac{1}{CkT}$ for deterministic mechanisms \cite{wang2015selling}. We also prove an upper bound $\frac{2}{\log 8kT}$ for any randomized mechanism. All the mechanisms we provide are in a greedy style. They are truthful and easy to be integrated into practical cloud systems.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Game Theory

R.I.P. πŸ‘» Ghosted

Blockchain Mining Games

Aggelos Kiayias, Elias Koutsoupias, ... (+2 more)

cs.GT πŸ› EC πŸ“š 273 cites 10 years ago

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted