Approximating k-Forest with Resource Augmentation: A Primal-Dual Approach

November 22, 2016 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› International Conference on Combinatorial Optimization and Applications

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Eric Angel, Nguyen Kim Thang, Shikha Singh arXiv ID 1611.07489 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 2 Venue International Conference on Combinatorial Optimization and Applications Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
In this paper, we study the $k$-forest problem in the model of resource augmentation. In the $k$-forest problem, given an edge-weighted graph $G(V,E)$, a parameter $k$, and a set of $m$ demand pairs $\subseteq V \times V$, the objective is to construct a minimum-cost subgraph that connects at least $k$ demands. The problem is hard to approximate---the best-known approximation ratio is $O(\min\{\sqrt{n}, \sqrt{k}\})$. Furthermore, $k$-forest is as hard to approximate as the notoriously-hard densest $k$-subgraph problem. While the $k$-forest problem is hard to approximate in the worst-case, we show that with the use of resource augmentation, we can efficiently approximate it up to a constant factor. First, we restate the problem in terms of the number of demands that are {\em not} connected. In particular, the objective of the $k$-forest problem can be viewed as to remove at most $m-k$ demands and find a minimum-cost subgraph that connects the remaining demands. We use this perspective of the problem to explain the performance of our algorithm (in terms of the augmentation) in a more intuitive way. Specifically, we present a polynomial-time algorithm for the $k$-forest problem that, for every $Ξ΅>0$, removes at most $m-k$ demands and has cost no more than $O(1/Ξ΅^{2})$ times the cost of an optimal algorithm that removes at most $(1-Ξ΅)(m-k)$ demands.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted