๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
Detecting communities is hard, and counting them is even harder
November 25, 2016 ยท The Ethereal ยท ๐ Information Technology Convergence and Services
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Aviad Rubinstein
arXiv ID
1611.08326
Category
cs.CC: Computational Complexity
Cross-listed
cs.DS,
cs.SI,
physics.soc-ph
Citations
10
Venue
Information Technology Convergence and Services
Last Checked
2 months ago
Abstract
We consider the algorithmic problem of community detection in networks. Given an undirected friendship graph $G=\left(V,E\right)$, a subset $S\subseteq V$ is an $\left(ฮฑ,ฮฒ\right)$-community if: * Every member of the community is friends with an $ฮฑ$-fraction of the community; * Every non-member is friends with at most a $ฮฒ$-fraction of the community. Arora et al [AGSS12] gave a quasi-polynomial time algorithm for enumerating all the $\left(ฮฑ,ฮฒ\right)$-communities for any constants $ฮฑ>ฮฒ$. Here, we prove that, assuming the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH), quasi-polynomial time is in fact necessary - and even for a much weaker approximation desideratum. Namely, distinguishing between: * $G$ contains an $\left(1,o\left(1\right)\right)$-community; and * $G$ does not contain an $\left(ฮฒ+o\left(1\right),ฮฒ\right)$-community for any $ฮฒ\in\left[0,1\right]$. We also prove that counting the number of $\left(1,o\left(1\right)\right)$-communities requires quasi-polynomial time assuming the weaker #ETH.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
๐ Similar Papers
In the same crypt โ Computational Complexity
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
An Exponential Separation Between Randomized and Deterministic Complexity in the LOCAL Model
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
The Parallelism Tradeoff: Limitations of Log-Precision Transformers
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
The Hardness of Approximation of Euclidean k-means
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
Slightly Superexponential Parameterized Problems
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal