RFexpress! - Exploiting the wireless network edge for RF-based emotion sensing
December 19, 2016 Β· Declared Dead Β· π IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Muneeba Raja, Stephan Sigg
arXiv ID
1612.06189
Category
cs.HC: Human-Computer Interaction
Citations
10
Venue
IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
We present RFexpress! the first-ever network-edge based system to recognize emotion from movement, gesture and pose via Device-Free Activity Recognition (DFAR). With the proliferation of the IoT, also wireless access points are deployed at increasingly dense scale. in particular, this includes vehicular nodes (in-car WiFi or Bluetooth), office (Wlan APs, WiFi printer or projector) and private indoor domains (home WiFi mesh, Wireless media access), as well as public spaces (City/open WiFi, Cafes, shopping spaces). Processing RF-fluctuation at such edge-devices, enables environmental perception. In this paper, we focus on the distinction between neutral and agitated emotional states of humans from RF-fluctuation at the wireless network edge in realistic environments. In particular, the system is able to detect risky driving behaviour in a vehicular setting as well as spotting angry conversations in an indoor environment. We also study the effectiveness of edge-based DFAR emotion and activity recognition systems in real environments such as cafes, malls, outdoor and office spaces. We measure radio characteristics in these environments at different days and times and analyse the impact of variations in the Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR) on the accuracy of DFAR emotion and activity recognition. In a case study with 5 subjects, we then exploit the limits of edge-based DFAR by deriving critical SNR values under which activity and emotion recognition results are no longer reliable. In case studies with 8 and 5 subjects the system further could achieve recognition accuracies of 82.9\% and 64\% for vehicular and stationary wireless network edge in the wild (non-laboratory noisy environments and non-scripted, natural individual behaviour patterns).
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Human-Computer Interaction
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Identifying Stable Patterns over Time for Emotion Recognition from EEG
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Questioning the AI: Informing Design Practices for Explainable AI User Experiences
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Learning for Sensor-based Human Activity Recognition: Overview, Challenges and Opportunities
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Educational data mining and learning analytics: An updated survey
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted