Clustering Uncertain Graphs

December 20, 2016 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐Ÿ› Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment

๐Ÿ‘ป CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Matteo Ceccarello, Carlo Fantozzi, Andrea Pietracaprina, Geppino Pucci, Fabio Vandin arXiv ID 1612.06675 Category cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms Citations 51 Venue Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment Last Checked 2 months ago
Abstract
An uncertain graph $\mathcal{G} = (V, E, p : E \rightarrow (0,1])$ can be viewed as a probability space whose outcomes (referred to as \emph{possible worlds}) are subgraphs of $\mathcal{G}$ where any edge $e\in E$ occurs with probability $p(e)$, independently of the other edges. These graphs naturally arise in many application domains where data management systems are required to cope with uncertainty in interrelated data, such as computational biology, social network analysis, network reliability, and privacy enforcement, among the others. For this reason, it is important to devise fundamental querying and mining primitives for uncertain graphs. This paper contributes to this endeavor with the development of novel strategies for clustering uncertain graphs. Specifically, given an uncertain graph $\mathcal{G}$ and an integer $k$, we aim at partitioning its nodes into $k$ clusters, each featuring a distinguished center node, so to maximize the minimum/average connection probability of any node to its cluster's center, in a random possible world. We assess the NP-hardness of maximizing the minimum connection probability, even in the presence of an oracle for the connection probabilities, and develop efficient approximation algorithms for both problems and some useful variants. Unlike previous works in the literature, our algorithms feature provable approximation guarantees and are capable to keep the granularity of the returned clustering under control. Our theoretical findings are complemented with several experiments that compare our algorithms against some relevant competitors, with respect to both running-time and quality of the returned clusterings.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Data Structures & Algorithms

Died the same way โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ป Ghosted