A Rigorous Framework for Specification, Analysis and Enforcement of Access Control Policies

December 29, 2016 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Andrea Margheri, Massimiliano Masi, Rosario Pugliese, Francesco Tiezzi arXiv ID 1612.09339 Category cs.SE: Software Engineering Citations 30 Venue IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Access control systems are widely used means for the protection of computing systems. They are defined in terms of access control policies regulating the accesses to system resources. In this paper, we introduce a formally-defined, fully-implemented framework for specification, analysis and enforcement of attribute-based access control policies. The framework rests on FACPL, a language with a compact, yet expressive, syntax for specification of real-world access control policies and with a rigorously defined denotational semantics. The framework enables the automatic verification of properties regarding both the authorisations enforced by single policies and the relationships among multiple policies. Effectiveness and performance of the analysis rely on a semantic-preserving representation of FACPL policies in terms of SMT formulae and on the use of efficient SMT solvers. Our analysis approach explicitly addresses some crucial aspects of policy evaluation, as e.g. missing attributes, erroneous values and obligations, which are instead overlooked in other proposals. The framework is supported by Java-based tools, among which an Eclipse- based IDE offering a tailored development and analysis environment for FACPL policies and a Java library for policy enforcement. We illustrate the framework and its formal ingredients by means of an e-Health case study, while its effectiveness is assessed by means of performance stress tests and experiments on a well-established benchmark.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Software Engineering

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted