Fundamental limit of resolving two point sources limited by an arbitrary point spread function

January 18, 2017 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› International Symposium on Information Theory

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Ronan Kerviche, Saikat Guha, Amit Ashok arXiv ID 1701.04913 Category physics.optics Cross-listed cs.IT, quant-ph Citations 28 Venue International Symposium on Information Theory Last Checked 2 months ago
Abstract
Estimating the angular separation between two incoherently radiating monochromatic point sources is a canonical toy problem to quantify spatial resolution in imaging. In recent work, Tsang {\em et al.} showed, using a Fisher Information analysis, that Rayleigh's resolution limit is just an artifact of the conventional wisdom of intensity measurement in the image plane. They showed that the optimal sensitivity of estimating the angle is only a function of the total photons collected during the camera's integration time but entirely independent of the angular separation itself no matter how small it is, and found the information-optimal mode basis, intensity detection in which achieves the aforesaid performance. We extend the above analysis, which was done for a Gaussian point spread function (PSF) to a hard-aperture pupil proving the information optimality of image-plane sinc-Bessel modes, and generalize the result further to an arbitrary PSF. We obtain new counterintuitive insights on energy vs. information content in spatial modes, and extend the Fisher Information analysis to exact calculations of minimum mean squared error, both for Gaussian and hard aperture pupils.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” physics.optics

R.I.P. πŸ‘» Ghosted

Scalable Optical Learning Operator

Uğur Teğin, Mustafa Yıldırım, ... (+3 more)

physics.optics πŸ› Nature Computational Science πŸ“š 147 cites 5 years ago

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted