The Influence of Teamwork Quality on Software Team Performance
January 22, 2017 Β· Declared Dead Β· π arXiv.org
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Emily Weimar, Ariadi Nugroho, Joost Visser, Aske Plaat, Martijn Goudbeek, Alexander P. Schouten
arXiv ID
1701.06146
Category
cs.SE: Software Engineering
Citations
21
Venue
arXiv.org
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
Traditionally, software quality is thought to depend on sound software engineering and development methodologies such as structured programming and agile development. However, high quality software depends just as much on high quality collaboration within the team. Since the success rate of software development projects is low (Wateridge, 1995; The Standish Group, 2009), it is important to understand which characteristics of interactions within software development teams significantly influence performance. Hoegl and Gemuenden (2001) reported empirical evidence for the relation between teamwork quality and software quality, using a six-factor teamwork quality (TWQ) model. This article extends the work of Hoegl and Gemuenden (2001) with the aim of finding additional factors that may influence software team performance. We introduce three new TWQ factors: trust, value sharing, and coordination of expertise. The relationship between TWQ and team performance and the improvement of the model are tested using data from 252 team members and stakeholders. Results show that teamwork quality is significantly related to team performance, as rated by both team members and stakeholders: TWQ explains 81% of the variance of team performance as rated by team members and 61% as rated by stakeholders. This study shows that trust, shared values, and coordination of expertise are important factors for team leaders to consider in order to achieve high quality software team work.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Software Engineering
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Microservices: yesterday, today, and tomorrow
π
π
The Cartographer
A Survey of Machine Learning for Big Code and Naturalness
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
An Overview on Smart Contracts: Challenges, Advances and Platforms
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Slither: A Static Analysis Framework For Smart Contracts
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
ContractFuzzer: Fuzzing Smart Contracts for Vulnerability Detection
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted