Hypercube LSH for approximate near neighbors
February 19, 2017 Β· Declared Dead Β· π International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Thijs Laarhoven
arXiv ID
1702.05760
Category
cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms
Cross-listed
cs.CC,
cs.CG,
cs.CR
Citations
5
Venue
International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
A celebrated technique for finding near neighbors for the angular distance involves using a set of \textit{random} hyperplanes to partition the space into hash regions [Charikar, STOC 2002]. Experiments later showed that using a set of \textit{orthogonal} hyperplanes, thereby partitioning the space into the Voronoi regions induced by a hypercube, leads to even better results [Terasawa and Tanaka, WADS 2007]. However, no theoretical explanation for this improvement was ever given, and it remained unclear how the resulting hypercube hash method scales in high dimensions. In this work, we provide explicit asymptotics for the collision probabilities when using hypercubes to partition the space. For instance, two near-orthogonal vectors are expected to collide with probability $(\frac{1}Ο)^{d + o(d)}$ in dimension $d$, compared to $(\frac{1}{2})^d$ when using random hyperplanes. Vectors at angle $\fracΟ{3}$ collide with probability $(\frac{\sqrt{3}}Ο)^{d + o(d)}$, compared to $(\frac{2}{3})^d$ for random hyperplanes, and near-parallel vectors collide with similar asymptotic probabilities in both cases. For $c$-approximate nearest neighbor searching, this translates to a decrease in the exponent $Ο$ of locality-sensitive hashing (LSH) methods of a factor up to $\log_2(Ο) \approx 1.652$ compared to hyperplane LSH. For $c = 2$, we obtain $Ο\approx 0.302 + o(1)$ for hypercube LSH, improving upon the $Ο\approx 0.377$ for hyperplane LSH. We further describe how to use hypercube LSH in practice, and we consider an example application in the area of lattice algorithms.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Data Structures & Algorithms
π
π
The Cartographer
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Route Planning in Transportation Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Near-linear time approximation algorithms for optimal transport via Sinkhorn iteration
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Hierarchical Clustering: Objective Functions and Algorithms
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Graph Isomorphism in Quasipolynomial Time
π
π
The Cartographer
Simulation optimization: A review of algorithms and applications
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted