Evaluation of Lightweight Block Ciphers in Hardware Implementation: A Comprehensive Survey

June 13, 2017 ยท The Cartographer ยท ๐Ÿ› arXiv.org

๐Ÿ“š THE CARTOGRAPHER: The Cartographer
Survey/review paper โ€” maps the landscape rather than implementing a method.

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
"Title-pattern auto-detect: Evaluation of Lightweight Block Ciphers in Hardware Implementation: A Comprehensive Survey"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Jaber Hosseinzadeh, Abbas Ghaemi Bafghi arXiv ID 1706.03878 Category cs.CR: Cryptography & Security Citations 8 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 3 days ago
Abstract
The conventional cryptography solutions are ill-suited to strict memory, size and power limitations of resource-constrained devices, so lightweight cryptography solutions have been specifically developed for this type of applications. In this domain of cryptography, the term lightweight never refers to inadequately low security, but rather to establishing the best balance to maintain sufficient security. This paper presents the first comprehensive survey evaluation of lightweight block ciphers in terms of their speed, cost, performance, and balanced efficiency in hardware implementation, and facilitates the comparison of studied ciphers in these respects. The cost of lightweight block ciphers is evaluated with the metric of Gate Equivalent (Fig.1), their speed with the metric of clock-cycle-per-block (Fig.2), their performance with the metric of throughput (Fig.3) and their balanced efficiency with the metric of Figure of Merit (Fig.4). The results of these evaluations show that SIMON, SPECK, and Piccolo are the best lightweight block ciphers in hardware implementation.(Abstract)
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Cryptography & Security