Do Convolutional Networks need to be Deep for Text Classification ?
July 13, 2017 ยท Declared Dead ยท ๐ AAAI Workshops
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Hoa T. Le, Christophe Cerisara, Alexandre Denis
arXiv ID
1707.04108
Category
cs.CL: Computation & Language
Citations
107
Venue
AAAI Workshops
Last Checked
2 months ago
Abstract
We study in this work the importance of depth in convolutional models for text classification, either when character or word inputs are considered. We show on 5 standard text classification and sentiment analysis tasks that deep models indeed give better performances than shallow networks when the text input is represented as a sequence of characters. However, a simple shallow-and-wide network outperforms deep models such as DenseNet with word inputs. Our shallow word model further establishes new state-of-the-art performances on two datasets: Yelp Binary (95.9\%) and Yelp Full (64.9\%).
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
๐ Similar Papers
In the same crypt โ Computation & Language
๐
๐
Old Age
๐
๐
Old Age
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehension
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Deep contextualized word representations
Died the same way โ ๐ป Ghosted
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted
Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift
R.I.P.
๐ป
Ghosted