Near Optimal Sized Weight Tolerant Subgraph for Single Source Shortest Path
July 16, 2017 Β· Declared Dead Β· π arXiv.org
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Diptarka Chakraborty, Debarati Das
arXiv ID
1707.04867
Category
cs.DS: Data Structures & Algorithms
Citations
1
Venue
arXiv.org
Last Checked
4 months ago
Abstract
In this paper we address the problem of computing a sparse subgraph of a weighted directed graph such that the exact distances from a designated source vertex to all other vertices are preserved under bounded weight increment. Finding a small sized subgraph that preserves distances between any pair of vertices is a well studied problem. Since in the real world any network is prone to failures, it is natural to study the fault tolerant version of the above problem. Unfortunately, it turns out that there may not always exist such a sparse subgraph even under single edge failure [Demetrescu \emph{et al.} '08]. However in real applications it is not always the case that a link (edge) in a network becomes completely faulty. Instead, it can happen that some links become more congested which can easily be captured by increasing weight on the corresponding edges. Thus it makes sense to try to construct a sparse distance preserving subgraph under the above weight increment model. To the best of our knowledge this problem has not been studied so far. In this paper we show that given any weighted directed graph with $n$ vertices and a source vertex, one can construct a subgraph that contains at most $e \cdot (k-1)!2^kn$ many edges such that it preserves distances between the source and all other vertices as long as the total weight increment is bounded by $k$ and we are allowed to have only integer valued (can be negative) weight on each edge and also weight of an edge can only be increased by some positive integer. Next we show a lower bound of $c\cdot 2^kn$, for some constant $c \ge 5/4$, on the size of the subgraph. We also argue that restriction of integer valued weight and integer valued weight increment are actually essential by showing that if we remove any one of these two restrictions we may need to store $Ξ©(n^2)$ edges to preserve distances.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Data Structures & Algorithms
π
π
The Cartographer
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Route Planning in Transportation Networks
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Near-linear time approximation algorithms for optimal transport via Sinkhorn iteration
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Hierarchical Clustering: Objective Functions and Algorithms
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Graph Isomorphism in Quasipolynomial Time
π
π
The Cartographer
Simulation optimization: A review of algorithms and applications
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted