Inspecting Maude Variants with GLINTS

July 18, 2017 ยท The Ethereal ยท ๐Ÿ› Theory and Practice of Logic Programming

๐Ÿ”ฎ THE ETHEREAL: The Ethereal
Pure theory โ€” exists on a plane beyond code

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Marรญa Alpuente, Angel Cuenca-Ortega, Santiago Escobar, Julia Sapiรฑa arXiv ID 1707.05599 Category cs.LO: Logic in CS Cross-listed cs.PL Citations 5 Venue Theory and Practice of Logic Programming Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
This paper introduces GLINTS, a graphical tool for exploring variant narrowing computations in Maude. The most recent version of Maude, version 2.7.1, provides quite sophisticated unification features, including order-sorted equational unification for convergent theories modulo axioms such as associativity, commutativity, and identity (ACU). This novel equational unification relies on built-in generation of the set of 'variants' of a term $t$, i.e., the canonical form of $t ฯƒ$ for a computed substitution $ฯƒ$. Variant generation relies on a novel narrowing strategy called 'folding variant narrowing' that opens up new applications in formal reasoning, theorem proving, testing, protocol analysis, and model checking, especially when the theory satisfies the 'finite variant property', i.e., there is a finite number of most general variants for every term in the theory. However, variant narrowing computations can be extremely involved and are simply presented in text format by Maude, often being too heavy to be debugged or even understood. The GLINTS system provides support for (i) determining whether a given theory satisfies the finite variant property, (ii) thoroughly exploring variant narrowing computations, (iii) automatic checking of node 'embedding' and 'closedness' modulo axioms, and (iv) querying and inspecting selected parts of the variant trees. This paper is under consideration for acceptance in TPLP.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

๐Ÿ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt โ€” Logic in CS