Quantum machine learning: a classical perspective

July 26, 2017 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Proceedings of the Royal Society A

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Carlo Ciliberto, Mark Herbster, Alessandro Davide Ialongo, Massimiliano Pontil, Andrea Rocchetto, Simone Severini, Leonard Wossnig arXiv ID 1707.08561 Category quant-ph: Quantum Computing Cross-listed cs.LG, stat.ML Citations 498 Venue Proceedings of the Royal Society A Last Checked 1 month ago
Abstract
Recently, increased computational power and data availability, as well as algorithmic advances, have led machine learning techniques to impressive results in regression, classification, data-generation and reinforcement learning tasks. Despite these successes, the proximity to the physical limits of chip fabrication alongside the increasing size of datasets are motivating a growing number of researchers to explore the possibility of harnessing the power of quantum computation to speed-up classical machine learning algorithms. Here we review the literature in quantum machine learning and discuss perspectives for a mixed readership of classical machine learning and quantum computation experts. Particular emphasis will be placed on clarifying the limitations of quantum algorithms, how they compare with their best classical counterparts and why quantum resources are expected to provide advantages for learning problems. Learning in the presence of noise and certain computationally hard problems in machine learning are identified as promising directions for the field. Practical questions, like how to upload classical data into quantum form, will also be addressed.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Quantum Computing

R.I.P. πŸ‘» Ghosted

Variational Quantum Algorithms

M. Cerezo, Andrew Arrasmith, ... (+9 more)

quant-ph πŸ› Nature Reviews Physics πŸ“š 3.3K cites 5 years ago

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted