Relaxing Exclusive Control in Boolean Games

July 27, 2017 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Francesco Belardinelli, Umberto Grandi, Andreas Herzig, Dominique Longin, Emiliano Lorini, Arianna Novaro, Laurent Perrussel arXiv ID 1707.08736 Category cs.AI: Artificial Intelligence Cross-listed cs.LO Citations 8 Venue Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
In the typical framework for boolean games (BG) each player can change the truth value of some propositional atoms, while attempting to make her goal true. In standard BG goals are propositional formulas, whereas in iterated BG goals are formulas of Linear Temporal Logic. Both notions of BG are characterised by the fact that agents have exclusive control over their set of atoms, meaning that no two agents can control the same atom. In the present contribution we drop the exclusivity assumption and explore structures where an atom can be controlled by multiple agents. We introduce Concurrent Game Structures with Shared Propositional Control (CGS-SPC) and show that they ac- count for several classes of repeated games, including iterated boolean games, influence games, and aggregation games. Our main result shows that, as far as verification is concerned, CGS-SPC can be reduced to concurrent game structures with exclusive control. This result provides a polynomial reduction for the model checking problem of specifications in Alternating-time Temporal Logic on CGS-SPC.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Artificial Intelligence

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted