Designing for Pragmatists and Fundamentalists: Privacy Concerns and Attitudes on the Internet of Things

August 19, 2017 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› SimpΓ³sio Brasileiro de Fatores Humanos em Sistemas Computacionais

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Lesandro Ponciano, Pedro Barbosa, Francisco Brasileiro, Andrey Brito, Nazareno Andrade arXiv ID 1708.05905 Category cs.HC: Human-Computer Interaction Citations 8 Venue SimpΓ³sio Brasileiro de Fatores Humanos em Sistemas Computacionais Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Internet of Things (IoT) systems have aroused enthusiasm and concerns. Enthusiasm comes from their utilities in people daily life, and concerns may be associated with privacy issues. By using two IoT systems as case-studies, we examine users' privacy beliefs, concerns and attitudes. We focus on four major dimensions: the collection of personal data, the inference of new information, the exchange of information to third parties, and the risk-utility trade-off posed by the features of the system. Altogether, 113 Brazilian individuals answered a survey about such dimensions. Although their perceptions seem to be dependent on the context, there are recurrent patterns. Our results suggest that IoT users can be classified into unconcerned, fundamentalists and pragmatists. Most of them exhibit a pragmatist profile and believe in privacy as a right guaranteed by law. One of the most privacy concerning aspect is the exchange of personal information to third parties. Individuals' perceived risk is negatively correlated with their perceived utility in the features of the system. We discuss practical implications of these results and suggest heuristics to cope with privacy concerns when designing IoT systems.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Human-Computer Interaction

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted