๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
Formalising Type-Logical Grammars in Agda
September 03, 2017 ยท The Ethereal ยท ๐ arXiv.org
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Wen Kokke
arXiv ID
1709.00728
Category
cs.LO: Logic in CS
Cross-listed
cs.CL
Citations
3
Venue
arXiv.org
Last Checked
5 months ago
Abstract
In recent years, the interest in using proof assistants to formalise and reason about mathematics and programming languages has grown. Type-logical grammars, being closely related to type theories and systems used in functional programming, are a perfect candidate to next apply this curiosity to. The advantages of using proof assistants is that they allow one to write formally verified proofs about one's type-logical systems, and that any theory, once implemented, can immediately be computed with. The downside is that in many cases the formal proofs are written as an afterthought, are incomplete, or use obtuse syntax. This makes it that the verified proofs are often much more difficult to read than the pen-and-paper proofs, and almost never directly published. In this paper, we will try to remedy that by example. Concretely, we use Agda to model the Lambek-Grishin calculus, a grammar logic with a rich vocabulary of type-forming operations. We then present a verified procedure for cut elimination in this system. Then we briefly outline a CPS translation from proofs in the Lambek-Grishin calculus to programs in Agda. And finally, we will put our system to use in the analysis of a simple example sentence.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
๐ Similar Papers
In the same crypt โ Logic in CS
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
Safe Reinforcement Learning via Shielding
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
Formal Verification of Piece-Wise Linear Feed-Forward Neural Networks
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
Heterogeneous substitution systems revisited
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
Omega-Regular Objectives in Model-Free Reinforcement Learning
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal