The number of linked references of publications in Microsoft Academic in comparison with the Web of Science

October 11, 2017 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Scientometrics

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Robin Haunschild, Sven E. Hug, Martin P. BrΓ€ndle, Lutz Bornmann arXiv ID 1710.04031 Category cs.DL: Digital Libraries Cross-listed cs.DB, cs.IR Citations 14 Venue Scientometrics Last Checked 2 months ago
Abstract
In the context of a comprehensive Microsoft Academic (MA) study, we explored in an initial step the quality of linked references data in MA in comparison with Web of Science (WoS). Linked references are the backbone of bibliometrics, because they are the basis of the times cited information in citation indexes. We found that the concordance of linked references between MA and WoS ranges from weak to non-existent for the full sample (publications of the University of Zurich with less than 50 linked references in MA). An analysis with a sample restricted to less than 50 linked references in WoS showed a strong agreement between linked references in MA and WoS.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Digital Libraries

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted