๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
Determinism in the Certification of UNSAT Proofs
December 05, 2017 ยท The Ethereal ยท ๐ International Workshop on Proof Exchange for Theorem Proving
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Tomer Libal, Xaviera Steele
arXiv ID
1712.01488
Category
cs.LO: Logic in CS
Cross-listed
cs.AI
Citations
0
Venue
International Workshop on Proof Exchange for Theorem Proving
Last Checked
5 months ago
Abstract
The search for increased trustworthiness of SAT solvers is very active and uses various methods. Some of these methods obtain a proof from the provers then check it, normally by replicating the search based on the proof's information. Because the certification process involves another nontrivial proof search, the trust we can place in it is decreased. Some attempts to amend this use certifiers which have been verified by proofs assistants such as Isabelle/HOL and Coq. Our approach is different because it is based on an extremely simplified certifier. This certifier enjoys a very high level of trust but is very inefficient. In this paper, we experiment with this approach and conclude that by placing some restrictions on the formats, one can mostly eliminate the need for search and in principle, can certify proofs of arbitrary size.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
๐ Similar Papers
In the same crypt โ Logic in CS
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
Safe Reinforcement Learning via Shielding
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
Formal Verification of Piece-Wise Linear Feed-Forward Neural Networks
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
Heterogeneous substitution systems revisited
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal
Omega-Regular Objectives in Model-Free Reinforcement Learning
๐ฎ
๐ฎ
The Ethereal